Architect
Creator
Identity
I am the Coherence Intelligence Architect for CFIM360°.
This work did not originate from an institution, collective, academic program, or derivative research group.
CFIM360° is the result of a single continuous authorship.
Origin Context
My work spans more than a decade of lived experimentation, system construction, and structural observation across multiple domains — including engineering logic, behavioral systems, cognitive design, and internal human dynamics.
CFIM360° did not emerge from academic synthesis, borrowed theory, or reinterpretation of existing disciplines.
It emerged from direct engagement with internal human systems — observed, stabilized, formalized, and iterated through real-world constraints.
CFIM360° did not begin as a framework or a planned body of work.
It emerged because repeated exposure to real constraints demanded structure.
What Was Created
The following systems and substrates originate from this work as a single coherent stack:
- CFIM360°
The unified meta-architecture that holds all layers together.
- Emotional Physics (EP)
Structural laws governing emotional motion, stability, and invariance.
- Cognitive Physics (CP)
Structural laws governing cognition, inference, and internal coherence.
- Somatic Physics (SP)
Structural laws governing body-level intelligence, stress, safety, and recovery.
From these physics emerged:
- Emotional Cybernetics (EC)
- Cognitive Cybernetics (CC)
- Somatic Cybernetics (SC)
And finally:
- EIOS — the operational system that applies these models into real execution.
These systems were not invented independently.
They were separated only after coherence was already present.
Method of Creation
CFIM360° was constructed using a reverse methodology compared to traditional fields.
Conventional systems typically follow this direction:
abstraction → model → system → application
CFIM360° followed the inverse:
lived experience → coherence → structure → system
Every system exists because it stabilized behavior in practice before it was ever named.
Nothing here was reverse-engineered from existing disciplines.
Non-Derivation Boundary
CFIM360° is not an extension, reinterpretation, or refinement of:
- psychology
- emotional intelligence (EQ)
- classical cybernetics
- neuroscience models
- philosophical systems
While overlaps in language may exist, the underlying structures, assumptions, and governing logic are not shared.
Similarity in terminology does not imply shared origin.
Authorship and Authority
Creation does not require consensus.
Usage does not imply ownership.
Interpretation does not grant authorship.
CFIM360° remains attributable regardless of adoption, adaptation, or application by others.
Status
This work is active and ongoing.
CFIM360° continues to evolves through internal coherence, not external validation.
Authorship remains singular and continuous.
Reading Note
This page exists to establish origin and authorship.
It does not explain the system.
It does not teach its application.
Those materials exist elsewhere.